EP36 PCI RR註冊報告計畫評審心得
PCI RR推薦人指派評審的論文:
Boedker, I., Giofrè, D., Cumming, G., & Tressoldi, P. (2021). Stage 1 Registered Report: The influence of journal submission guidelines on authors’ reporting of statistics and use of open research practices: five years later. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/e6whp
計畫作者的前一份研究:
Giofrè, D., Cumming, G., Fresc, L., Boedker, I., & Tressoldi, P. (2017). The influence of journal submission guidelines on authors’ reporting of statistics and use of open research practices. PLOS ONE, 12(4), e0175583. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175583
- PCI RR的評審指標
1A. The scientific validity of the research question(s).
1B. The logic, rationale, and plausibility of the proposed hypotheses, as applicable.
1C. The soundness and feasibility of the methodology and analysis pipeline (including statistical power analysis or alternative sampling plans where applicable).
1D. Whether the clarity and degree of methodological detail is sufficient to closely replicate the proposed study procedures and analysis pipeline and to prevent undisclosed flexibility in the procedures and analyses.
1E. Whether the authors have considered sufficient outcome-neutral conditions (e.g. absence of floor or ceiling effects; positive controls; other quality checks) for ensuring that the obtained results are able to test the stated hypotheses or answer the stated research question(s).
這份計畫的研究問題、假設、研究方法
我的評審意見
再省思科學研究問題的效度
